|
Stefano
Maggi Transport history. Methodological and bibliographical notes
What kind of transport history do we need?
In the studies about transport, historiography
of the single means of conveyance always remained prevalent, with
a predominant position of the railways followed by the maritime
navigation. The historians often forgot that the infrastructures
of transport must be analyzed in an overall sight in order to understand
their economic and social effects. The concentration in some sectors
of transport instead of others led to a narrow vision of the movement
in each territory, made it ignored the concept of “network”,
and therefore caused a scarce knowledge of the traffic on the roads,
of the coasting trade, of the inland navigation, of the air navigation,
of the pipe transport.
At present, the need is that of history of the
movement of people and goods in the space, among different places,
while less interest presents the history of railways, ships, roads,
motor-vehicles, aeroplanes, which give a limited view of the economic
and social change. Such histories are too limited also for the recent
research of environmental history, tightly linked to transports,
which are very important both for the production of pollution and
for the consumption of energy, and even for the modelling of the
landscape.
We need, at the different geographical levels,
history of transport network and mobility contained in the general
history. While transport history would have to be taken into account
by general historians, as it was demonstrated, with masterly skill,
in the work by F. Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean
World in the Age of Philip II, one of the few in which transport
is perfectly embodied in the narrative and interpretation of events.
In order to obtain that historians consider transport
also in researches about other sectors, we need to develop transport
historiography, proving that transport is very important in each
historical fact, in peace and war. But we need also to provide more
information and data regarding the system of mobility in each period
and in each area.
About transport, the present historiography needs
more detailed studies of the markets of passengers and freight,
to answer some questions: why passengers and consignors of commodities
chose one form of transport rather than another? What degree of
competition there was? Why one prevailed or why more than one went
on existing side by side? Least but not last, which was the degree
of mobility in a territory, in a period, in a society?
About the specific field of passengers, we need
to learn much more about “tourism”, productive of great
economic and social changes in contemporary age. In a few words,
“we need history of the movement of people and things between
places” (M. Robbins, The progress of transport history,
in “The Journal of Transport History”, March 1991, p.
85).
|